by kara on March 7, 2013

The Republican Party is so dumb that their last presidential nominee was a Twilight fangirl. Mitt Romney actually admitted on The Today Show back during the hellfire that was the 2012 presidential election cycle, that he enjoyed the stories about the sexy abstinent vampires from the Twilight series of books and movies.

“I mean, I like the Twilight series. I thought it was fun,” Romney said. “I don’t like vampires personally, I don’t know any, but you know my granddaughter was reading it and I thought, ‘Well this looks like fun,’ so I read that.”

(Mitt went on to say that he was on Team Jacob before he was on Team Edward. Unless you like Jacob, in which case he does too. Has he mentioned that he saved the Olympics?)

So, Mittens was down with a bunch of asexual Mormon vampires. Definitely qualified him for the highest office in the nation. I mean, knowing this, aren’t you more glad than ever that Obama won? I do not know one single adult who would dare to admit enjoying those books. And here I thought that George W Bush was a mental midget for waiting until he was in his 50′s to read The Stranger. W is like Aristotle compared to Mitt.

Didn’t the LDS Church President declare Twilight to be infallible scripture?? Maybe Mittens is just doing his homework. Bonding with lonely 15 year old girls. That’s laying groundwork for another future Mrs. Mittens. Mormons can have oodles of them wives, you know. Besides, Twilight is way more credible than The Book of Mormon. Genius, in a horrible, twisted, pedophilia kind of way. But genius nonetheless.

Call me shallow and a reading elitist, never, but I would ever, never in a million years vote for a man that admits to reading that stuff. I will, however, kick him in the nuts repeatedly, if given the opportunity.

Now I can’t wait for Romney to tell us whether he prefers the Sneeches with stars upon their tunnies or the Sneeches without.

{ Comments on this entry are closed }

On the Nightstand

by kara on March 4, 2013

Beyond Belief by Jenna Miscavige Hill

{ Comments on this entry are closed }

by kara on February 20, 2013

I love Judith Krantz’s house in Bel Air, on the 17th hole of the Bel-Air Country Club off Sunset Boulevard. The 8,000-square-foot house was built in 1938 and has a two story library.

[click to continue…]

{ Comments on this entry are closed }

Bookshelf Porn.

by kara on February 19, 2013

[click to continue…]

{ Comments on this entry are closed }

Authors choose to write under pseudonyms for a variety of reasons. Some simply don’t want to associated with the junk they’re writing. Some want to to gauge the level of their popularity. After the successes Carrie, ‘Salem’s Lot, and The Shining, Stephen King wanted to see if his books would be as successful when written by “Richard Bachman”. Feeling the pressure of celebrity, King said, “I think I [wrote as Bachman] to turn down the heat.”

Of course in the olden times, female writers knew their gender prevented their stuff from being taken seriously. The Brontë Sisters chose gender neutral pen-names (Currer, Ellis and Acton Bell), to prevent exposing themselves to prejudice or condescension. George Sand parted with her chimerical and fantastic name: Madame Amandine Lucile Aurore Dudevant, née Dupinone, to claim her equality with the male writers of the time. Mary Ann Evans, who authored arguably the greatest English novel of all time, also opted for “George”, to ensure her works were taken seriously and not associated with lowly romantic novels. Even Ann fucking Rule needed a dude name (Andy Stack) to be taken seriously writing that garbage. This cockamamie mentality still haunts the modern lit world – Joanne Rowling opted to be cryptic, fearing young boys might be wary of a book written by a girl –  and in the form of “chick lit” book covers on non-chick lit novels, e.g. Prep and The Bell Jar.

There are the writers who simply want to explore a new writing voice without jeopardizing their reputations. One of my favorite authors, as well as one of the most prolific mystery writers of modern times, Ruth Rendell, reinvented herself as Barbara Vine – not to mask her identity, rather to write in a “different way” –  with different types of characters and different sense of place.

So what if you were a dude, say a sci fi writer or a writer of Westerns or war novels, but secretly yearn to satisfy your inner Danielle Steel? What if you were to-the-manor-born, to a genre that, in 1970, feminist Germaine Greer claimed enslaved women, encouraging them to cherish “the chains of their bondage”? Because everyone knows that only women are qualified to write romance novels. Men are supposed to be writing books about war, or sharks. What do men know of windswept love, passion, histrionics and romance, epic romances set in exotic locations, bodice ripping, swooning, ample-bosomed heroines and aggressive and possessive heroes and spitfire heroines?

Meet Bill Spence, aka “Jessica Blair”. Bill is a a handsome 89 year old grandfather from  North Yorkshire, who, in a gender-bending surprise, announced he is the Jessica Blair behind the popular Jessica Blair romance series.

[click to continue…]

{ Comments on this entry are closed }

Suicide Chick-Lit

by kara on February 2, 2013

 

From gallerycat: To commemorate the 50th Anniversary of Sylvia Plath’s “The Bell Jar,” a dark, semi-autobiographical novel about a young woman’s struggle with mental illness, UK publisher Faber decided to issue a new cover. This sounds appropriate — exciting, in fact — except that the cover is an ultra-feminine stock photo of a woman applying makeup (pictured above, right).

The London Review of Books weighs in on the controversy:

It should be possible to see ‘The Bell Jar’ as a deadpan younger cousin of Walker Percy’s ‘The Moviegoer,’ or even William Burroughs’s ‘Naked Lunch.’ But that’s not the way Faber are marketing it. The anniversary edition fits into the depressing trend for treating fiction by women as a genre, which no man could be expected to read and which women will only know is meant for them if they can see a woman on the cover. (Things are slightly better for lady authors in the US.)

The cover, which seemingly rebrands the classic piece of literature into chick lit, has inspired some creative responses (left), and this is the edition I have (right).

 

 

 

 

 

{ Comments on this entry are closed }

I hate Breakfast at Tiffany’s. I hate the black Givenchy dress, the tiara and foot-long cigarette holder, a grotesque parody of elegance. I hate the character’s “dahling”. I hate how, minutes after meeting her new neighbor Paul, Holly launches into an asinine explanation of why her cat doesn’t have a name, even though no one fucking asked (she has commitment issues!)  I hate how she tells him she is going to Sing-Sing, apropos of nothing (prison! Quel adorable!) I hate how we are not supposed to hate Holly Golightly for being the kind of asshole who repeatedly buzzes her neighbor in the middle of the night (she can’t remember her keys!) I hate that the character spawned the Manic Pixie Dream Girl.

Sure, I hate the buck-toothed Japanese neighbor (think, Mr Ed and “Ms. Go-Right-Ree), vulgar by even by WWII propaganda film standards. But it’s the film’s treatment of the central whore character, and of women in general, that I find appalling and deluded. The fact that Holly bribes him into submission with vacant promises of nude photos is enough to make me forgive Mickey Rooney.

“I need money and I’m going to do whatever it takes to get it”.  - Holly Golightly, 1961

The film was based on the 1958 novella that was set in 1943. But the movie is set in 1961. That is, while Holly was flapping around like a retarded toucan in a tiara trying to bag a billionaire, Bella Abzug was leading women’s protests against nuclear weapons and the U.S. involvement in the war in Southeast Asia. When Lulamae Barns was remaking herself as a party girl called Holly Golightly, Gloria Steinam was going undercover at the Playboy Club. While Holly is running out on her john – after he’s picked up the dinner check for her and her 5 friends (she isn’t even an honest hooker), – JFK was scripting the Equal Pay Act.  [click to continue…]

{ Comments on this entry are closed }

Vintage Library Posters

by kara on January 25, 2013

{ Comments on this entry are closed }

On the Nightstand

by kara on January 22, 2013

Brain on Fire by Susannah Cahalan

Free Press, publication date: November 13, 2012

{ Comments on this entry are closed }

by kara on January 22, 2013

The British Museum’s Enlightenment Room is a display dedicated to the age of Enlightenment. Separated into the various arts and sciences, there are books, fossils and statues on display, along with examples of earthenware and metalwork, which try to explain how pieces were viewed and collected at the time.

{ Comments on this entry are closed }